Backlinks
What are backlinks, and which ones count?
A backlink is a link on someone else's website that points to a page on yours. Search engines use links to find pages, and as a sign that another site vouches for the page it links to. Where a link comes from matters far more than how many you have. Sites can mark a link so that search engines treat it as a hint rather than a vote, though on the home pages of 34 large sites we checked, most outbound links carried no such mark.
In short
- A link has four parts that decide its worth: the page it sits on, the address, the rel attribute and the anchor text.
- Of 702 outbound links on the home pages of 34 large sites, 96 (14%) were marked nofollow, sponsored or ugc. Publishers marked most of theirs; software companies marked almost none.
- In a 2024 test by Ahrefs, paid guest posts cost $77.80 on average and paid links in existing articles $361.44. Links that are paid for and pass ranking break Google's spam policy.
- Count referring domains, not links: ten links from one site are one vote, repeated.
The four parts of a link
Every link is a short piece of HTML on someone else's page. Four things about it decide what it is worth.
1 freelancetaxes.example/guides/invoicing
We tried four tools before settling on invoicing software that handles two currencies.
<a href="https://yoursite.com/invoicing"(2) rel="nofollow"(3)>invoicing software(4)</a>
- 1The linking pageWhere the link sits. Its topic, its readers and the sites that link to it decide how much the link is worth.
- 2The address it points toThe href. A link to a specific guide helps that page; a link to your home page helps the site in general.
- 3The rel attributeOptional. Without one the link is a normal link. nofollow, sponsored and ugc ask Google not to treat it as a vote; since 2019 Google reads them as hints.
- 4The anchor textThe clickable words. Google asks for words that describe the page linked to, not "click here".
Google's documentation on crawlable links sets out the mechanics. Google can follow a link written as an a element with an href attribute. A link added by JavaScript counts if it ends up in the page as that same markup; a button that changes the page with a script, and has no href, does not.
The same page asks for anchor text that is "descriptive, reasonably concise, and relevant" to the page linked to, and names "click here" as the thing to avoid. For a link on an image, the image's alt text does the job of anchor text.
Links marked not to count
A site can tell search engines how to treat a link with the rel attribute. Google's guidance names three values:
| Value | Meant for | Example |
|---|---|---|
| sponsored | Advertisements and paid placements | A link you paid a publication for |
| ugc | Content written by a site's users | Blog comments, forum posts |
| nofollow | Anything else the site does not want to vouch for | A link to a site being criticised |
Until 2019 Google ignored nofollow links entirely. On 10 September 2019 it announced that all three values would be treated as hints: Google may take them into account or not. They became hints for ranking that day, and for crawling and indexing on 1 March 2020. A link with none of these values is what people call a "dofollow" link, though there is no such attribute. It is simply a normal link.
How often sites mark their links
We wanted to know whether marked links are the exception or the rule, so on 14 November 2026 we read the home pages of the same 60 large sites as our robots.txt study and counted every link that pointed to another website.
Thirty-four home pages could be read and had outbound links on them. Between them they had 702 outbound links, and 96 of those (14%) carried nofollow, sponsored or ugc. Almost all were nofollow; one link was marked sponsored and one ugc.
The marking was concentrated in a few places. The Verge marked 56 of its 77 outbound links, TechCrunch 8 of 9 and Healthline 9 of 18. DigitalOcean marked all 10 of its own. Twenty-eight of the 34 sites marked none at all, including Stripe, HubSpot, Salesforce, GitHub and Wikipedia.
Read that with its limits. A home page links out mostly to social profiles and app stores, not to the editorial links that matter for search, and 26 of the 60 sites either refused our request or had no outbound links on the page. It is a check of 34 home pages on one day, and the data is published so you can see every site. What it does show is that "most links on the web are nofollow" is not true of large sites' home pages.
Types of backlinks
| Type | Example | Usually a normal link? | What it costs | Worth it when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editorial mention | A journalist or blogger cites your study | Yes | Nothing but the work that earned it | Always. This is the link search engines are built to reward |
| Resource or list page | A "tools we use" or "further reading" page | Yes | Usually free; ask the owner | The page is maintained and on your topic |
| Comparison or roundup article | "Best invoicing tools for freelancers" | Usually | Free if you earn a place; some charge | You belong on the list on the merits |
| Guest post | An article you write for another site | Often, unless paid | Time; $77.80 on average when paid, in Ahrefs' test | The site's readers are your buyers |
| Partner, supplier or integration page | A software marketplace listing your app | Usually | Free with the partnership | You genuinely work together |
| Directory or listing profile | Your trade association's member list | Varies | Free to a few hundred dollars a year | The directory is one buyers actually use |
| Review site profile | G2, Trustpilot, Yelp | Usually nofollow | Free to claim | Assistants and buyers read these, link or not |
| Forum post, comment or social profile | A Reddit answer, a LinkedIn profile | Usually ugc or nofollow | Time | You are answering a real question |
| Paid placement in an existing article | A link added to an old post for a fee | Should be sponsored | $361.44 on average in Ahrefs' test | Only if marked sponsored, and then for the visitors, not the ranking |
The prices come from a test Ahrefs describes in an article last updated in July 2024. It pitched 180 sites for paid guest posts and contacted 450 sites across nine niches to buy links in existing articles; 12.6% of the second group agreed to sell. The same article cites a survey of 755 link builders by Authority Hacker that put the average paid link at $83. The test itself is undated, so treat the figures as a guide to the order of magnitude.
What makes a link worth having
Google does not publish a formula. Its spam policies say what does not count: links made to manipulate ranking. What follows is our reading of what a link that does count tends to have, not a rule from Google.
- The linking page is about the same subject. A link from a cycling blog to a bike shop means something. A link from a casino page does not.
- Real people read the linking page. A page that ranks and gets visitors passes on more than one nobody visits.
- It sits in the body of the text. A link inside a sentence that refers to you beats one in a footer or a list of "partners".
- Somebody chose to put it there. The link exists because the writer thought their reader would want your page.
Backlinks and referring domains
Ten links from one website are ten backlinks and one referring domain. The second number is the one to watch. A hundred links from a single site that links to you in its footer is one vote, repeated a hundred times.
Most backlink tools report both. If yours shows thousands of backlinks from a few dozen domains, look at which domains: a single site-wide footer link inflates the first number and changes nothing else.
How many backlinks do you need?
There is no number. What you need is to be in the same range as the pages already ranking for the search you care about, and that is something you can measure:
- Search the phrase you want to rank for and note the ten pages on the first page.
- Look up the referring domains for each of those pages, not for their whole sites, in a backlink tool. Ahrefs has a free backlink checker; the paid tools show more.
- Take the middle value of the ten. That is roughly the bar.
- Compare it with your own page's count. If you are far below, links are a likely part of the gap. If you are close and still not ranking, the gap is more likely the page itself.
For step 4, the page comparison tool puts your page and a competitor's side by side on 12 on-page checks, which rules out the simpler causes first.
How to see your own
Google Search Console has a free Links report that lists the sites linking to you and the pages they link to. It is a sample, not a complete list, and it shows only your own site. To see a competitor's links you need a third-party tool.
How to get them
Slowly, and mostly by being worth linking to.
- Publish something another writer can cite. A number you measured, a tool, a clear explanation of something confusing. People link to things they can use. We built free tools and ran two small studies partly for this reason.
- Get onto the pages that already list businesses like yours. Comparison articles, your trade's directories, review sites. Email the author with one specific reason you belong there.
- Be a source. Answer questions in your field under your own name, in forums and for journalists. The link follows the usefulness.
- Turn partnerships into links. Suppliers, integration partners and associations you belong to often have a page that lists members. Ask to be on it.
Should you buy backlinks?
Google's spam policies say buying or selling links that pass ranking is link spam. The same policy says a paid link is fine when it is marked rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow", because then it does not pass ranking. So a paid link that is properly marked is an advertisement: worth buying for the visitors it sends, and for nothing else.
In practice, most sites that sell links do not mark them, because a marked link is not what the buyer wants. That is the risk. Google's most likely response to links it does not trust is to ignore them; the worst is a manual action against a site that relied on them heavily.
What to avoid
The same spam policies list excessive link exchanges, automated programs that create links to your site, and links in widely distributed templates or footers. The practical test for any offer is whether you would be comfortable with a customer seeing the page the link sits on. Our guide to link exchanges covers swaps in detail, including the rules we enforce in our own.
Do backlinks matter for AI answers?
In a different way. An assistant builds its answer from pages it finds through search, so a page that ranks is a page that can be read and cited, and links help it rank. Beyond that, what gets a business named is being mentioned on the pages the assistant reads, with or without a link. The steps are here.
Questions
- Are nofollow links worthless?
- Not entirely. Since 2019 Google treats nofollow as a hint it may or may not use, and a nofollow link on a page people read still sends visitors. A mention in a place buyers look is worth having either way.
- What is a toxic backlink?
- A link from a site that exists to sell links or host spam. Google's help page on disavowing links says most sites will not need to use the tool; the tool is for sites with a manual action, or that bought links in the past and want to clean up.
- How long does a new backlink take to have an effect?
- Google has to crawl the linking page first, which can take days or weeks. After that there is no fixed delay, and the effect of a single link cannot be seen on its own.
- Is a link from a high-authority site always better?
- Not always. A link from a large general site on an unrelated page can be worth less than one from a smaller site whose readers are exactly your buyers. Authority scores are third-party estimates, not Google figures.
Sources
Each one was opened and read on 14 November 2026. Figures in the text say what was counted, how many and when.
- 1.crawlable links (/search/docs/crawling-indexing/links-crawlable) · developers.google.com
- 2.guidance (/search/docs/crawling-indexing/qualify-outbound-links) · developers.google.com
- 3.announced (/search/blog/2019/09/evolving-nofollow-new-ways-to-identify) · developers.google.com
- 4.Test Ahrefs describes · ahrefs.com
- 5.spam policies (/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies) · developers.google.com
Content Autopilot team
We make Content Autopilot, an SEO and AI visibility product
Our guides are drafted with AI from the sources listed above, and every figure is checked against its source before it is published. Where we sell something a guide discusses, the guide says so.